Print document
 1 of 1 
 
A REPRESENTATIVE COPY OF THE FILING
-iv-
   Finney v. Nugent
   Case No. 04-55769
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
  Cases                                                                                              Page(s)
Ahmed v. State of Washington,
No. 00-35660 (9th Cir. December 27, 2001), vacated June 18, 2002 ..       17
Appling v. State Farm Mutual,
203 WL 21920905, (9th Cir. August 13, 2003) ……………….…...…  5, 10
Azzaro v. County of Allegheny,
110 F.3d. 968 (3rd Cir. 1997) ……………………………………..….
   12
Badillo-Santiago v. Navera-Merly,
_F.3d_, 2004 WL 1687881 (1st Cir. July 29, 2004) …………………
   24       
Berry v. Baca,
No. 03-56004 (9th Cir. August 13, 2004) ……………………………      21
Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Umbehr,
518 U.S. 668, 671-72 (1996)  ………………………..……..….……
   12
Britt v. North Carolina,
404 U.S. 226, 227 (1971) …………………………….…………….. 
     7
Brown v. Board of Education,
347 U.S. 483 (1954) ………………………………………...……….
1, 3
Cantanella v. State of California,
No. 0016782 (9th Cir. September 9, 2002) ………………………..    18, 19 
City of Littleton v. Z.J. GIFTS D-4, L.L.C.,
124 S. Ct  225 ………………………………………………………..
     6
Conant v. Walters,
309 F.3d 629 (9th Cir. 2002) …………………………………………
   32
Déjà Vu of Nashville, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville
& Davidson County, Tenn.,
274 F.3d 279 (6th Cir. 2001) …………………………………………
      6
-v-
   Finney v. Nugent
   Case No. 04-55769
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  Cases - continued                                                                             Page(s)                    
                             
Douglas v. California Department of Youth Authority,
271 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2001) …………………………………………
   24
Dream Palace v. County of Maricopa,
9th Cir. September 27, 2004) __F.3d__, 2004 DAR 12034,
2004 WL 2169437 ………………………………………………..….
     6
Duvall v. County of Kitsap,
206 F.3d 1124, 1133 (9th Cir. 2001) ……………………..…     20, 23-4, 28
Estate of Meeker
(1993) 13 Cal. App. 4th 1099 ………………………………………..
     9
Garcia v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories,
No. 03-1712 (6th Cir. October 7, 2004) ……………………………...      10
Griffin v. School Board,
377 U.S. 218 (1964) …………………………………………………
     4
In re Levander,
180 F.3d 1114, 1118 (9th Cir. 1999) …………………………………
   10
In re Markus,
268 BR 556, 564 (BAP 9th Cir. 2001) ………………………………..
   25
In re Monroe Communications Corp.,
840 F.2d 942, 946-47 (D.C. Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 906,
112 S. Ct. 297, 116 L. Ed. 2d 241 (1991) ……………………………
   16
Independence Mining v. Babbit,
105 F.2d 705 (9th Cir. 1997) …………………………………….. 16, 27-28
Kennedy v. Lockyer,
No. 01-55246 (9th Cir. August 18, 2004) …………………………….
     7
Kelly v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.,
No. 03-35050 (June 24, 2004) ……………………………………….
   22
-vi-
   Finney v. Nugent
   Case No. 04-55769
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Cases – continued
Page(s)    
 
                             
Kougasian v. TSML, Inc.,
359 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2004) …………………………………
    23
Kuba v. 1A Agricultural Ass’n., 
No. 02-16989 (9th Cir. October 19, 2004) ……………………………
    21
Liu v. Amway Corp.,
347 F.3d 1125, 1136-37 (9th Cir. 2003) ………………………………
    15
Lockhart v. United States of America,
No. 02-35759, (9th Cir. July 23, 2004) …………………………….…
     5
Lovell v. Chandler,
303 F.3d 1039, 1050 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 123 S. Ct., 
871 (2003) …………………………………………………………...
   22
Lyons v. England, 
307 F.3d 1092, 1101-02, 1115-16 (9th Cir. 2002) ……………………
   16
Miller v. Gammie,
335 F.3d 889 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) …………………………….…
   20
New v. Consol. Rock Prods. Co.,
171 Cal. App. 3d 681, 289 (1985) ……………………………………
   26
Newman v. Piggy Park Enters, Inc.,
390 U.s. 400, 401-402 (1968) ………………………………………..
   24
Oliveros v. County of Los Angeles,
Second District Cal. Ct. of Appeal, Div. Five, No. B163333
(July 28, 2004) …………………………………………………….….
     9
Prescod v. AMR, Inc.,
No. 02-55097 (9th Cir. August 19, 2004) …………………………….
   26
Public Utility District No. 1 v. IDA Corp Inc.,
No. 03-35207 (9th Cir. August 10, 2004) ………………………….…
   25
-vii-
   Finney v. Nugent
   Case No. 04-55769
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  Cases – continued                                                                         Page (s) 
Quest International, Inc. v. ICODE Corp.,
No. G032276, September 22, 2004 …………………………………
      
7
Rhodes v. Robinson,
No. 03-15335 No-15335, (9th Cir. August 19, 2004) …………….…..
   11
Rivero v. City & County of San Francisco,
316 F.3d 857 (9th Cir. 2002) ……………………………………….…
     5
SEC v. Chenery Corp.,
318 U.S. 80 …………………………………………………………...
   27
Settlegoode v. Portland Public Schools,
362 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2004) …………………………………………    22
Smith v. State of Idaho,
No. 02-36043 (9th Cir. September 7, 2004) ……………………….….
   25
State of Oregon v. Ashcroft,
No. 02-35587 (9th Cir. May 26, 2004) ………………………………. 
   32
Turner v. City of Memphis,
369 U.S. 350 (1962) ………………………………………………… 
     3
Tennessee v. Lane,
124 S. Ct. 1978 (2004) ……………………………………   2, 3, 17, 22-24
United States v. Frega,
No. 97-50100 (9th Cir. June 8, 1999) ……………..……………….…      20
United States v. Johnson,
256 F.3d 895, 914 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc) ………………………… 
     5
United States of America v. Smith,
No. 03-30482 (9th Cir. October 15, 2004) ……………………………
   14
Vaughn v. United States Small Business Administration,
No. 93-5104, (6th Cir. September 21, 1995) ………………………… 
     5
-viii-
   Finney v. Nugent
   Case No. 04-55769
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  Cases – continued                                                                          Page (s)
Walker v. Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach,
263 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 2001) ………………………………………...
    13
Waters v. Churchill,
511 U.S. 661 (1994) …………………………………………………..     12
Wilson v. Layne,
526 U.S. 603, 617 (1999) …………………………………………..…       5
Federal Statute(s)
Americans with Disabilities Act, Title II …………………………..    passim
28 CFR 35.134 …………………………………………………….…        12
18 U.S.C. § 1001 (a)(1) ………………………………………………
        9
State Statutes
San Diego Superior Court Local Policy Against Bias ………..……  passim
California Rule of Court 989.3 ………………………………….…  passim
Addendum
Professor Chris Sanchirico, “Evidence Tampering,”  
Duke Law Journal, February, 2004, Volume 53, No.4 ………………
   26